🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.