Los Angeles Dodgers Claim the Championship, Yet for Latino Fans, It's Complicated
In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the baseball championship didn't happen during the nail-biting final game last Saturday, when her squad executed one dramatic comeback act after another before winning in extra innings over the opposing team.
It happened in the previous game, when two second-tier players, Kike Hernández and Miguel Rojas, executed a thrilling, decisive sequence that at the same time challenged many negative stereotypes promoted about Hispanic people in the past decades.
The play in itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to snag a ball he initially lost in the stadium lights, then fired it to second base to secure another, decisive out. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball moments before a runner barreled into him, sending him backwards.
This was not just a great sporting achievement, perhaps the key turn in the series in the team's direction after looking for much of the games like the underdog team. For Molina, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a badly needed morale boost for the community and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, troops patrolling the streets, and a steady stream of negativity from official sources.
"The players presented this counter-narrative," explained Molina. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being key figures on the team, exhibiting a different kind of confidence. They're bombastic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."
"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It is so easy to be disheartened right now."
However, it's entirely straightforward to be a Dodgers supporter nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other fans who attend faithfully to home games and occupy as many as half of the stadium's fifty thousand seats each time.
A Complicated Connection with the Team
After aggressive enforcement operations started in the city in early June, and military units were sent into the city to respond to resulting protests, two of the city's soccer teams promptly released statements of support with affected communities – but not the baseball team.
The team president has said the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of political issues – a stance influenced, possibly, by the reality that a significant minority of the supporters, including Latinos, are followers of current leaders. After significant public pressure, the team later committed $1m in support for families directly affected by the raids but issued no official criticism of the administration.
Official Visit and Historical Heritage
Three months before, the organization did not hesitate in accepting an offer to celebrate their previous World Series win at the White House – a move that sports writers labeled as "pathetic … weak … and hypocritical", considering the team's boast in having been the pioneering major league franchise to end the racial segregation in the 1940s and the regular invocations of that legacy and the values it represents by executives and current and past players. Several players including the coach had expressed reluctance to travel to the White House during the initial period but then changed their minds or succumbed to demands from team management.
Business Ownership and Supporter Conflicts
An additional complication for supporters is that the team are owned by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, according to sources and its own published financial documents, include a share in a detention company that runs detention centers. The group's executives has said repeatedly that it aims to remain neutral of political matters, but its critics say the silence – and the investment – are their own type of acquiescence to certain agendas.
These factors add up to significant conflicted emotions among Latino supporters in especial – feelings that surfaced even in the euphoria of this year's hard-fought World Series victory and the following explosion of team pride across Los Angeles.
"Is it okay to support the team?" area columnist Erick Galindo agonized at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant article ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our minds". He couldn't finally bring himself to view the World Series, but he still felt strongly, to the point that he decided his one-man boycott must have given the team the fortune it required to win.
Distinguishing the Players from the Management
Numerous fans who have similar misgivings appear to have decided that they can keep to support the players and its roster of global stars, featuring the Asian megastar a key player, while pouring scorn on the organization's corporate leadership. Nowhere was this more evident than at the victory celebration at the home venue on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in support of the manager and his players but booed the executive and the chief executive of the ownership group.
"The executives in formal attire don't get to take our boys in blue from us," the fan said. "We've been with the Dodgers longer than they have."
Historical Background and Community Effect
The problem, however, goes further than just the organization's present owners. The agreement that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s involved the city razing three working-class Latino communities on a elevated area overlooking the city center and then selling the property to the team for a fraction of its market value. A track on a mid-2000s record that chronicles the story has an impoverished parking attendant at the stadium stating that the house he lost to removal is now a part of the field.
Gustavo Arellano, perhaps southern California most influential Latino columnist and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the long, dysfunctional dynamic between the franchise and its fanbase. He calls the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for years.
"They have acted around Latino fans while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to get away with it," the writer wrote over the summer, when demands to boycott the team over its lack of reaction to the raids were upended by the awkward reality that attendance at home games remained steady, even at the peak of the demonstrations when the city center was under to a evening curfew.
International Players and Community Bonds
Distinguishing the team from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {